On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Surely not. It seems like a much better idea to not have lzcompress deal
>> with varlena at all but pass that responsibility one layer upwards. That
>> shouldn't be very hard.
I'll figure out something.
> and as noted, it's going to take additional refactoring to make it
> possible to do that in pg_lzcompress. In view of all the potentially
> unportable stuff Andres committed today, we need the buildfarm to be
> at full strength; so I've reverted this commit until it can be worked
> out a bit better.
Makes sense.
--
Michael
