Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 01/31/2016 04:34 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >This page would need a refresh IMO. I think it has not been touched > >for the last couple of years. > > No doubt but if we can't bother to keep that refreshed what makes us think > that a structured format in commit messages that magically (through a lot of > hard work and extra parsing anyway) is going to be any more accurate?
If you're proposing to keep that page updated, please propose that in pgsql-www instead of hijacking this thread.
