Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS-=0jh2+u7iV6TOmyt6E0V+PPVUj_rUcDCrM9CdUGo0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL consistency check facility
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thoughts?

There are still a couple of things that this patch makes me unhappy,
particularly the handling of the GUC with the xlogreader flags. I am
not sure if I'll be able to look at that again within the next couple
of weeks, but please be sure that this is registered in the next
commit fest. You could for example do that by changing the patch from
"Returned with Feedback" to "Moved to next CF" in the commit fest app.
Be sure as well to spend a couple of cycles in reviewing patches.
Usually for one patch sent, that's one patch of equal difficulty to
review, and there are many patch still waiting for feedback.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: function xmltable
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Stopping logical replication protocol