Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRbiw7-_dWZn_BEhkCyF5g2xECd64vRtLTz+50JPvcMog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an
> implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int,
> point, or uuid.
It makes sense. I'll update the patches according to that.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans