Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRYRBpg-uPS3Bup-qvGNN3izMTXqVF4uyYaYBBo5OCn=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> Pushed, thanks.
>
> Shouldn't we consider back-patching these improvements into 9.5 and 9.4?
> ISTM the main point is to help debug buildfarm failures, and we won't be
> getting much benefit if only one-third of such reports have decent
> logging.

1ea0620 can be directly cherry-picked on REL9_5_STABLE. For
REL9_4_STABLE the attached looks to work fine.

buildfarm will need to be patched btw... Here is the result of a run
including the log improvements:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dangomushi&dt=2015-07-09%2019%3A53%3A02&stg=bin-check
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes