Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRUu9Px7q6ZGxrwDgrPRkjH3Pdi6ZyHGs1U2yjat5d3Tw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-02-01 16:49:46 +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Yeah.  On 9.4 there are already some conflicts, and I'm sure there will
>> be more in almost each branch.  Does anyone want to volunteer for
>> producing per-branch versions?
>
>> The next minor release is to be tagged next week and it'd be good to put
>> this fix there.
>
> I don't think this is going to be ready for that. The risk of hurrying
> this through seems higher than the loss risk at this point.

Agreed. And there is no actual risk of data loss, so let's not hurry
and be sure that the right think is pushed.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions