Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRT_7JZyXq+R9X_Hx9Aq_z-DvX6JV7f50uU3HtzuJvNkQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Review comments:
>> 1.
>> + bool is_partial);
>> +
>>
>> Seems additional new line is not required.
> Fixed

This patch has a patch, no new reviews. Moved to CF 2017-03.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pinning a buffer in TupleTableSlot is unnecessary