On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Finally, extensions got their own category in this taxonomy, though I
> wonder if it would be better to instead have
> Activity/ExtensionActivity, Client/ExtensionClient,
> Timeout/ExtensionTimeout, and IPC/ExtensionIPC instead of making it a
> separate toplevel category.
I don't think that it is necessary to go up to that level. If you look
at the latest patch, WaitLatch & friends have been extended with two
arguments: classId and eventId, so extensions could just use
WAIT_ACTIVITY as classId and WE_EXTENSION as eventId to do the
equivalent of ExtensionActivity.
--
Michael
