Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_reorg in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRRwmwd9QYNkmjGuA1aKau9J1bfOj2pH44yYqsDhuMwog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_reorg in core?  (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_reorg in core?  (sakamoto <dsakamoto@lolloo.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:

> If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> development, well I don't really buy that.

I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.

I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
github fork.

https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/

I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
the ownership.
Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?