On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> All the summaries added here have actually managed to revive this one
> usefully early in the release cycle! Well done. I just tried to apply
> Michael's 20130325_recovery_guc_v3.patch and the bit rot isn't that bad
> either. 5 rejection files, nothing big in them.
Not sure if it will help, but I have in one of my dev branches a
version of this patch in sync with master branch... Please see
attached... At least it will avoid to have to realign the code of v3.
--
Michael
