Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRJgxo2A465E2Vn2=Gbnx6k5Y9u9POC_baFZRAcRU32+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h  (Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  not tested
> Implements feature:       not tested
> Spec compliant:           not tested
> Documentation:            not tested
>
> This commit only affects comments, so I'm confident it doesn't break code, though I did not run the tests.
>
> I understand that the pg_xlog directory was renamed to pg_wal (confirmed that this is in the changelog too), so the
commentchanges seem correct.
 
>
> I am marking this Ready for Committer.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Thanks for the update. This has been already committed though as of 4260c05.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: AP
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Next
From: Ryan Murphy
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2017-09 - How do I know what commit to apply patches to