Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRBio+DCmU=804vXR9pWmSTwPjMoFhCZ+je_f4fqiB-qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:56 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 3/10/17 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/17 17:03, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>> Having something like --limit-retained-segments partially addresses
>>> it, as long as there is a way to define an automatic mode, based on
>>> statvfs() obviously.
>>
>>
>> But that is not portable/usable enough, as we have determined, I think.
>>
>> Have you looked into using inotify for implementing your use case?
>
>
> This thread has been idle for quite a while.  Please respond and/or post a
> new patch by 2017-03-24 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
> "Returned with Feedback".

I have no idea what to do here, so I just marked it as returned with feedback.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan?