On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
On 12/11/2014 02:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> While the CFs are still doing (1), support for (2) ended sometime in the >> 9.3 development cycle. Partly this is because current CFMs are not >> permitted to take authoritative steps to ensure that the CF ends on >> time, and partly it's because of the increase in big complicated patches >> which just don't fit into the CF cycle. > > I don't see why you think CFMs are not "permitted" to close out a CF > when they want to. At least some of the fests have been closed out per > calendar schedule, punting unprocessed patches to the next fest. We've > certainly utterly failed to do that since August, but I think that's > mismanagement.
I love how you're willing to accuse Michael of mismangement when you yourself have *never* run a CF. If I was Michael, I'd quit right now.
Er, just to be clear, I was basically not the CF manager for the one that began in October. I just showed up because I had some hours left and things were not moving on for many patches. Now, and I think that nobody is volunteering, I am fine to be the next CF manager for the one beginning on Monday. That would help making things move on.
