Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRAJ+wXrDPEydfO6x_duuPYOdJhTPyueboiwGPHwjwYJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (David Rowley <dgrowley@gmail.com>)
Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm thinks.
>
> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.

All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX