Re: POLA violation with \c service= - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: POLA violation with \c service=
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqR6q+5Q67w0TUShK1kFSnPwSTwMOzgcQwYA_TQkBVP6rA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POLA violation with \c service=  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: POLA violation with \c service=
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:13:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > I have pushed this after some rework.  For instance, the 9.0 and 9.1
> > > versions believed that URIs were accepted, but that stuff was introduced
> > > in 9.2.  I changed some other minor issues -- I hope not to have broken
> > > too many other things in the process.  Please give the whole thing a
> > > look, preferrably in all branches, and let me know if I've broken
> > > something in some horrible way.
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time to do this.  Will test.  I'm a little
> > unsure as to how regression tests involving different hosts might
> > work, but I'll see what I can do.
>
> Well, contrib/dblink is failing all over the place, for one thing.


OSX and Windows builds are broken as well, libpq missing dependencies
with connstrings.c. Sent a patch is here FWIW:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTO1FN7iNXaPS2eXDy4WXBnCWnOOawePtt-JvOrLi36kg@mail.gmail.com
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind tests
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Sloppy SSPI error reporting code