On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I think this is just an excuse for turning --no-security-labels
> into --no-object-property=security-label. To me, that's just plain
> worse.
It does not seem that my thoughts here have been correctly transmitted
to your brain. I do not mean to change the user-facing options, just
to refactor the code internally so as --no-foo switches can be more
easily generated, added and handled as they are associated with an
object type. A portion of the complains is caused by the fact that a
lot of similar code is duplicated.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
