Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQpRFnikqGDMbtxeEsj6sO40TYHh8D9zESQ+GA8KnEKXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I might missing something but, these functions will generate WAL?
> If they does, we will face the situation where we need to wait
> forever, Fujii-san pointed out.

No, those functions are here to manipulate the metadata defining the
quorum/priority set. We definitely do not want something that
generates WAL.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Next
From: Uriy Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR