Re: logical changeset generation v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: logical changeset generation v3
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQhG578ai7vPKezBM_sXqiC70pVwDv8o5w5j2e1jOo_-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical changeset generation v3  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2012-11-21 14:57:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>wrote:
> > It implies that snapstate->nrrunning has lost touch with reality...
> >
> Yes, I can reproduce in 10-20 seconds in one of my linux boxes. I haven't
> outputted anything in the logs, but here is the backtrace of the core file
> produced.

Could you run it with log_level=DEBUG2?
Let me try.
Do you run pgbench after youve reached a consistent state (by issuing a
manual checkpoint)?
Yes. I issue a manual checkpoint to initialize the replication.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v3
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v3