Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQgJo4AxyRsV3kGq_=KKav0Apjasrr8PQRq+si_duYavQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I did miss the need to fix the docs, and am happy to put in some strong
> wording about the security hazards of these functions while fixing the
> docs.  But I do not think that leaving them with hardwired superuser
> checks is an improvement over being able to control them with GRANT.

Sorry about that. lobj.sgml indeed mentions superusers. Do you need a patch?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq connection strings: control over the cipher suites?