Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQcRBdX79oqO+iJEoF5=JCAG8gv6c0bqyjUi=a2vhd-9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking at this thread, the last version of this patch is available here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZRvkCKc=1Y6_Wn8mk97_Vi8+j-aX-RY-=msrJVU-Ec-qw@mail.gmail.com
>> And they do not apply correctly, so this patch needs a rebase.
>
> That isn't so. The latest version is much more recent than that. It's
> available here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZQTqsCLZ1YJ1OuWFpO-GmFHwtgwTOg+o_NNzxrPa7Cx4A@mail.gmail.com
>
> Everything is tracked in the commitfest app in detail.
Oops, sorry. I got mistaken because of the name of the latest attachments.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg