Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQcFUDg-1NCV1neC4tdARJ=DRqXLkGRb6VATj_=zX=nGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
Responses Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>
> Good point. I think moving those would be a good thing even though it is
> technically not necessary for AT_AddConstraintRecurse, since that one should
> only be related to check constraints.

Andreas, are you planning to send an updated patch?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Table-level log_autovacuum_min_duration
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: RangeType internal use