Re: [HACKERS] Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQaGC9sGnZ4q-meeR4FXeB_P44--P9G9E5faYz_dEz+jw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no
> objections.

And done. Moved to the non-bug section.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands