Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQUBAaHMs+cuDSsET8nxXEZ5E9VN7gDO3j0Dm8ms032SQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we need to consider the sorting method and the selecting k-th
> latest LSN method?

Honestly, nah. Tests are showing that there are many more bottlenecks
before that with just memory allocation and parsing.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] invalid combination of options "-D - -F t -X stream" in pg_basebackup