Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQHfF751QBwm_H9wFs1VZmJWR=yY4vtNpdSsiFu=YwLdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Please persuade us with measurements that allowing this impact on
> ANALYZE would really improve performance at least in your case, and
> also examine the effect of this on the accuracy and usefulness of the
> gathered statistics.

FWIW, there was last week a developer meeting in Tokyo, and Seki-san
has presented such measurements. So it is not like nothing exists in
this area.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning