Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQGwCFHin5aTY6FVEHOKW_LvHQi2LJAd0=7RmoHiSZJnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does any body else see the use case
> reported by Chapman important enough that we try to have some solution
> for it in-core?

The lack of updates in the pg_lesslog project is a sign that it is not
that much used. I does not seem a good idea to bring in-core a tool
not used that much by users.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: revert behavior of IS NULL on row types
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility