On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-05-19 11:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> +1 for moving it at least 1 month.
>
> 2015-06-15 also collides with pgcon, which probably isn't the best
> idea. I do think we should try hard doing a triage at the start of a CF
> and not many with experience in the project are going to have time
> around then.
>
> So, to where do we move it? We probably need to schedule at least the
> first CF now. Just to 2015-07-15? That'd leave us enough room to
> schedule the rest at pgcon.
That's in line with what I got in mind.
>> There are many remaining open items.
>
> At least on https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
> there not really that many?
On top of those items, many patches and features (I mean a lot!) have
been committed just before the feature freeze deadline. I would think
that those things should be looked at a second time by extra eyes.
--
Michael
