Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQEfA5Jw+BHswOob-8UuNixixAYxmkt2hu0sjHj=N9fmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery  (Prajilal KP <prajilal.kp@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Prajilal KP <prajilal.kp@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see, As there are many reasons exists for the data corruption i couldn't
> figure out it exactly.
> Unfortunately there is no backup for this system and is not possible to
> restore from the backup.

Well, then, lost data is lost.

> I have been using the NFS storage since 2013 and didn't experience this
> issue before, now i am afraid.
> We haven't set to run the fysnc() in our environment.
>
> If i set "fysnc to on" now, did it make any impact to current flow?

Having fsync = off in postgresql.conf is a perfect method to corrupt
your data, you should really not set it to off.
--
Michael


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Prajilal KP
Date:
Subject: Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery
Next
From: Prajilal KP
Date:
Subject: Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery