Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQAt2B0x7Uk0F1cFDOgw5S9nZ71t_PSAd-vWJA4B6dv7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 12/13/15 9:16 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Please see the attached to address those things (and others) with
>> extra fixes for a couple of comments.
>
> I have ported these changes to the new world order and divided them up
> into more logical changes that are more clearly documented.  Please
> check that this matches what you had in mind.

Thanks for the new patches, this fell of my radar. This new version
looks fine to me.

+       /* If we have CREATE|UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, then add "ON"
and existing
+          indexes */
This comment format is not correct.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: rajan
Date:
Subject: Need help on pgcrypto
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Need help on pgcrypto