On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnaka@iki.fi) wrote:
>> I think we should adopt that exact format, so that our verifiers are
>> compatible with RFC 5803. It doesn't make any immediate difference,
>> but since there is a standard out there, might as well follow it.
>
> +1
>
>> And just in case we get support for looking up SCRAM verifiers from
>> an LDAP server in the future, it will come handy as we won't need to
>> parse two different formats.
>
> Agreed.
+1 to all that. Consistency is a good thing.
--
Michael
