Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ5M=h=UAOiS3Nw4==hJAioZoYzZgX1fHNcMqOGsMnFDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> That's still strange to have a dummy object in
>> postgres_fdw.so just for testing purposes.
>
> We could drop the extra functions at the end of the test, but I don't
> see the point exactly.  We'd just be leaving the regression test database
> with some odd contents of the extension --- there's not any wider effect
> than that.

Oh, I see. Then we rely just on the fact that postgres_fdw is
installed. Are you working on a patch? Do you need one?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Catalin Iacob
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions