Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ2-MbwG9QfHSRUebwxCp4u2i0iaqxtUKRU+QFgY-ux4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Anyway. I accept it's too late for beta1 now. Let's commit it if there's
> another catversion bump.
+1. Let's rely on the experience of senior committers here.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)