Re: Can extension build own SGML document? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Can extension build own SGML document?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ1bX9MtCaOW-WPKh_zCRT5O8t1q7Jc-9hKsu2TC7zvcg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can extension build own SGML document?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Can extension build own SGML document?  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think the only way upstream Postgres could offer this is as a way to
> build a separate "book", i.e. not a chapter/section within the main
> book.  I think it would require huge complications in doc/src/sgml's
> Makefile.  Not sure it's worthwhile.

I am not sure either, and as each project/developer have always
different requirements I am convinced that this is going to be
finished with enforced rules in Makefile rules for sure, so it is
really unclear what would be the potential benefit to have a
centralized facility. Take for example man pages,  those should not be
installed in share/doc/extension/ which is the default path, but in
$(DESTDIR)$(mandir)/man1...
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add --log-output to pg_ctl on Windows
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.