Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwaVjXzYJxZVbEQuOjNRYz+1XLE-V5oZsT0DAqNJQgUbXw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Em qui., 25 de set. de 2025 às 18:31, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> escreveu:
This pattern is used because you can pass more than one argument, for
example, something like

I know that

While I agree that the wording is a little awkwardthis follows the same
pattern as pg_dump and friends.

well, I think pg_dump looks wrong too. Because if you explain that it's a 
single table or single schema on docs, why you write on plural on usage ?
+        Repack or analyze all tables in
+        <replaceable class="parameter">schema</replaceable> only.  Multiple
+        schemas can be repacked by writing multiple <option>-n</option>
+        switches.

instead of 
+ printf(_("  -n, --schema=SCHEMA             repack tables in the specified schema(s) only\n"));
maybe this ?
+ printf(_("  -n, --schema=SCHEMA             repack tables in the specified schema, can be used several times\n"));

regards
Marcos

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unused parameter on check_and_push_window_quals