Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Request a Demo
Home
>
mailing lists
Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Marcos Pegoraro
Subject
Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Date
December 14
20:30:07
Msg-id
CAB-JLwa7XLuMBH5sqwue+tFEDyPWDVMk9ufBGjCB6fAOAUTQ4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
Responses
Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
When reading documentation all the time we get something like
See
Section 27.4.5
and
Section 27.4.2
for details.
The only way to know what it is that Section is opening and reading its title.
Wouldn't it be better if we print somethink for better reading like this ?
See
VACUUM
Progress Reporting
and
CLUSTER Progress Reporting
for details.
There are places where links are mixed, some of them are auto explanatory, some don't, like on See Also of VACUUM
vacuumdb
,
Section 19.10.2
,
Section 24.1.6
,
Section 27.4.5
,
Section 27.4.2
For that we need only put a "xreflabel" tag on that target link.
I can create a patch for all of them, but I would like to know why it's done this way.
regards
Marcos
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
"Jelte Fennema-Nio"
Date:
14 December, 19:56:23
Subject:
Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Next
From:
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
14 December, 20:35:17
Subject:
Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
×
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies