Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 1
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwYxQc7YQV4eb9uVUsiESkGfCk5p+zQe+LgF2JFEyqdGfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 1  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 1
List pgsql-hackers
> 2138: Incremental Materialized View Maintenance

I've responded to it in the following thread, and described the recent discussions,
current status, summary of IVM  feature and design, and past discussions.
 
IVM is a wonderful feature, but some features were omitted because of its complexity, so maybe IVM will spend more time to completely solve what it wants to do.
I did not understand, and didn´t find on docs, if a Materialized View is a table, why I cannot change a specific record ?
Because if I have a way to create and refresh the entire view and update a single record it would give me all power of IVM is trying to. 

regards,
Marcos

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marcos Pegoraro
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and publication/subscription problem
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication