I suggest you explain what changes would make the docs better (meaing
more useful).
Well, I think I already did this in this discussion.
Tom said that some functions were copied from Oracle, so it is ok to mention them. I don't think so.
Tomas said that we can mention other vendors, even if others don't do the same for us. I don't think so again.
But David answered that would be cool if we create a separate page/wiki/tool which compares, translates or anything like that to other databases.
So, if we have a "Compatibility/Translation/Feature Comparison/ ... with other Databases", it would be so cool.
But we don't have this kind of page, so why do we need to mention just one of them ?
Searching on SGML there are 0 mentions to SQL Server and MySQL, but there are almost 50 mentions to Oracle.
So this is my point, if you don't do the same for others, why do it for Oracle ?
And again, I'm not saying that migrations from Oracle are not important, I'm saying migrations from Oracle have the same importance than from MySQL, SQL Server, Mongo, ...
regards
Marcos
