Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwY-N87MQt5A4v1oSAuVcS1mKxsPCoRW5k8yHMpvqxm7XQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Em seg., 22 de abr. de 2024 às 11:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
No ... what would be the difference then

Well, I think if a cluster index was defined sometime in a table, it should be respected for next commands, including VACUUM FULL. 
If I want to come back to PK or any other index I would use CLUSTER ... USING PK_INDEX.

regards
Marcos

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL