Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Christopher Kline
Subject Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather
Date
Msg-id CAArmHzRG4vi0rp8QetTWSeT0ZJj58qzn0jmvKXhZs_Y7c96bWw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Agreed.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:42 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com> writes:
> Thank you all for the clarification. I like David Johnston's suggestion of
> # capped at max_parallel_workers
> That clearly defines the constraint.

I was thinking perhaps "# limited by max_parallel_workers"
or something like that.  "Capped at" isn't phraseology we
use elsewhere.


"limited by" is indeed better IMO as well.

David J.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather