On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 20:29, sirisha chamarthi
<sirichamarthi22@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran your test1 exactly like your setup except the row count is 3000000 (with 13275 blocks). Shared_buffers is 128MB
andthe hardware configuration details at the bottom of the mail. It appears Master + 0001 + 0005 regressed compared to
masterslightly .
Thank you for running these tests.
Can you share if the plans used for these queries was a parallel plan?
I had set max_parallel_workers_per_gather to 0 to remove the
additional variability from parallel query.
Also, 13275 blocks is 104MBs, does EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) indicate
that all pages were in shared buffers? I used pg_prewarm() to ensure
they were so that the runs were consistent.
David
