Re: ensure, not insure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: ensure, not insure
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvriOLWYD47Ga3E6skJjY1EQVeo0NwKqkocN6ZP8oj=AoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ensure, not insure  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: ensure, not insure
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 14:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:28PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > Those all look fine to me too.
>
> +1.

I've pushed this.  I backpatched due to the typo in the fsync GUC
description.  I'd have only pushed to master if it were just the
comment typos.

I noticed older versions had another instance of "insure" in a code
comment. I opted to leave that one alone since that file is now gone
in more recent versions.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC names in messages
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock