Re: btoidsortsupport issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: btoidsortsupport issue
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrgS+J1YnWfGA6dcO2mGGGh8LfYGSs5dd4-UeDC7wnCaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: btoidsortsupport issue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 at 09:40, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > What Peter pointed out has already been pointed out in the thread that
> > I linked to. I felt it was useful to point out the duplicate to avoid
> > anyone wasting time looking deeper or producing a duplicate fix. Maybe
> > I've missed something, but I did try John's fix, and it does make
> > Peter's test pass, so to me it seems like a duplicate report.  What
> > did I miss?
>
> Ah, nothing.  You pointed to the original message with the faulty
> patch, not to the downthread message that said it was wrong, so
> I misunderstood what you were saying.

Oh sorry. I should have paid more attention. I'd mistakenly thought
the whole thread was about the bug. I only got involved halfway
through and didn't read the initial email. Ooops.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: btoidsortsupport issue
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock