On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 at 00:14, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> On 2026-Apr-24, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> > OK. Including the comma within a larger translated string seems like a
> > better idea.
> >
> > Since you now have the list `length`, I wondered why not simplify
> > further to use list_nth indexing? Then you can remove
> > `foreach_current_index` and `lc`.
>
> WFM.
Wouldn't it be simpler to put the comma on the other end of the name
and use that if (foreach_current_index(lc) > 0) ?
Or was this to reuse a translation and you didn't want to swap
"\"%s\", " for , "\"%s\" ?
David
