On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 02:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> As I just responded to Hayato-san, I think there's a good case
> for removing the HASH_DEBUG code rather than fixing it (again).
No objections here. It feels like it must not get used very often if
it's taken almost 5 years for someone to notice the warning.
The reason I thought to backpatch the fix was that I was less sure
about removing it in backbranches and thought that should just be
fixed and any consideration to remove it would be in master only.
David
