On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 at 19:49, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The patch looks good to me.
>
> > The misreporting of the storage likely isn't a big deal. I suspect
> > rescans of Material nodes are not massively common, so maybe it's not
> > worth backpatching a fix.
>
> I have no evidence but I feel same as you (rescans of Material nodes
> are not massively common). Probably it's not worth backpatching. If we
> need backpatching, we could do it later.
Thanks for the review. I went with no backpatch for now.
Pushed after addressing the things mentioned by Kawata-san.
David
