On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 03:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that we should prefer foo != NULL, but if the surrounding code
> in a particular location just tests if (foo), then it may be better in
> that case to go that route.
+1. I generally do (var != NULL) for pointers rather than (var). I
think it makes the code easier to read as a reader instantly knows
"var" is a pointer and not an int or bool.
Also, agree that we can relax that a little when all the surrounding
code does (var)
David
