Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Rowley
Subject Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqb1ia7Bbn-wHmXxPkgDWRaCZ9uBHN1ak3ajbD0AW3RTg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 04:57, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Reproduced here.  The example works in v11, and in v10 if you remove
> the unnecessary-to-the-example primary key, so it seems like a clear
> regression.  I didn't dig for the cause but I suppose it's related
> to Andres' slot-related changes.

Looks like c2fe139c20 is the breaking commit.

David



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation