On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 13:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > The reason I left it an unsigned type was that the check is doing: if
> > (chsize + ALLOC_CHUNKHDRSZ != blk_used), so we'd still catch this with
> > an unsigned type, even if it wrapped due to going negative due to a
> > bogus freeptr. Changing to a signed type would leave us with a few
> > tests comparing signed to unsigned types.
>
> Yeah, that's fair. I'm content with what you have.
Thanks for the reviews. I've pushed and backpatched to 13.
David
