Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqCMihULF5bWomSG56d=H9+LA4M8Cp1QKJAWghoHUsMhA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 09:21, Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are we still thinking that reordering the VACUUM (and ANALYZE) options
> makes sense. And, if so, should it be alphabetical within parameter
> category? That is, all actual parameters (e.g. FULL and FREEZE) are
> alphabetically organized first followed by all parameter types (e.g.
> boolean and size) alphabetically listed?

I've opened a thread for that [1].

David

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo1eWbt5PVpk0G=yCbBNgLU7KaRP6dCBHpNbFaBjyGyQA@mail.gmail.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?