On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 02:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > So looks like it's the fault of the calling code and not an issue with
> > bms_prev_member().
>
> Yeah. But perhaps it'd be reasonable to put in an Assert checking
> that?
Seems like a good idea.
> Grammar nitpick: comment should be more like "set in the Bitmapset".
Agreed.
David