Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpwjsxBYEsLLj5Z==zqZK4JZn2S_uc0Pi3dGACSsgOQyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Responses Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 09:42, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
> So, what shall we do about this? I've been looking at the v29 of the
> index prefetching patch series, which is using this attribute in a bunch
> of places. And that reminded me of this thread.
>
> I guess we should just commit that, so unless someone objects soon I'll
> just do that. ISTM the agreement is to backpatch this too.

How about just backpatching the new macro and leaving the old one in
place back branches? There should be slightly less backpatching pain
that way, for us, and fewer merge issues for people maintaining forks
on existing versions.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Add bms_offset_members() function for bitshifting Bitmapsets
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-table resync for logical replication subscriptions